This is about : BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again
And this article : BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again
Article Bundesgerichtshof, Article Bundespatentgericht, Article European patent law, Article German civil procedure, Article German Federal Court of Justice,
BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again
In two decisions published yesterday on its website, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) overturned two decisions by the Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) invalidating the patents in suit for lack of novelty. Both decisions are remarkable not because they break new ground in (patent) law (they don't), but rather because the BGH corrects the fact finding of the lower court and finds in favour of the patentees. They fuel the impression that the Federal Court of Justice is more patent-friendly than the Bundespatentgericht, or, to put it another way, that the Federal Patent Court has become overly strict.In the first decision, designated a leading case (Leitsatzentscheidung) by the Court, the BGH finds that a key witness lacked credibility and concludes that the public prior use which led the Federal Patent Court to invalidate the patent for lack of novelty was not established. The patent at issue was Nichia's EP 936 682, an important patent concerning white light emitting diodes that has also been the subject of opposition proceedings before the EPO. The decision is remarkable because the Federal Court of Justice is bound by the fact finding of the lower court unless there are specific doubts regarding the correctness and completeness of the fact finding (§ 529(1) Civil Procedure Act). The Court held that there were specific doubts as to the credibility of a key witness for the public prior use, whose testimony was inconsistent with that of other witnesses and established facts. The twist was that the witness had died in the meantime and could not be questioned again. This, so the BGH, did not preclude it from finding the testimony unpersuasive. After it had concluded that public prior use was not proven, the Court assessed inventive step based on the record before it and found the subject matter(s) of the claims to be inventive.
Fig. 1 of EP 1 389 985 |
Articles BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again finished we discussed
A few of our information about the BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again, I hope you can exploit carefully
No've You've finished reading an article on BGH rules for patentees on appeal - again and many articles about modern home in our blog this, please read it. and url link of this article is http://liveeconcerts.blogspot.com/2016/10/bgh-rules-for-patentees-on-appeal-again.html Hopefully discussion articles on provide more knowledge about the world of tech gadgets.
Tag : Bundesgerichtshof, Bundespatentgericht, European patent law, German civil procedure, German Federal Court of Justice,
Hey Guys !
ReplyDeleteUSA Fresh & Verified SSN Leads AVAILABLE with best connectivity
All Leads have genuine & valid information
**HEADERS IN LEADS**
First Name | Last Name | SSN | Dob | DL Number |Address | State | City | Zip | Phone Number | Account Number | Bank Name
*Price for SSN lead $2
*You can ask for sample before any deal
*If anyone buy in bulk, we can negotiate
*Sampling is just for serious buyers
==>ACTIVE & FRESH CC FULLZ ALSO AVAILABLE<==
->$5 PER EACH
->Hope for the long term deal
->Interested buyers will be welcome
**Contact 24/7**
Whatsapp > +923172721122
Email > leads.sellers1212@gmail.com
Telegram > @leadsupplier
ICQ > 752822040
Para esquecer a disfunção erétil para sempre, aconselho você a encontrar um medicamento confiável e eficaz. Você deve sempre carregá-lo com você. Não conte ao seu parceiro sobre problemas íntimos. Aqui está o remédio kamagra gel 100mg preço que me ajudou a voltar à minha antiga vida ativa!
ReplyDelete